Sana 2.0 and the revenge of the hamster-skin codpiece. - Ramblings on the nature of reality

(Note- this section is still very rough, and I don't really know how to phrase a lot of this in ways 'normal' people will process, so if it seems like I'm jumping around a lot, I apologize.)

I don't think anyone percieves the world the same, not really; obviously for some its more different than others but everyone has their own take on reality.

Its like colour theory, to use the stereotypical AS Philosophy argument.

And I kind of... I wouldn't see these 'realities' as mutually exclusive. I sort of think everything both has been and has not yet been, and is, and will be, and can never be, all at once. Light is both a wave and a particle. The cat is both alive and dead. And so on and so forth.

Its sorta like a magic eye painting, wherethe universe you get depends on how you choose to look. You following? Its different from paralell timelines (though I'm pretty sure that is also something that may exist. Or at least, that makes logical sense).

Its more that, objective reality may or may not be a Thing. But as you can never, ever be sure if the thing you see is that thing, then you must assume that all Things are equally valid. Though your own interpretation of the thing, is the universe you live in, and you ought to learn how it works. Whether the dude across the street is abiding by the same cosmos as you, is irrelevent.

You could be hallucinating. You could be in a coma. You could be a squid. We could all be collectivley insane. But whether we are or not, doesn't matter, only our own perceptions.